{{ currentBoardShortName }}
  • Markets
  • Indices
  • Currencies
  • Energy
  • Metals
Markets
As of: {{timeStamp.date}}
{{timeStamp.time}}

Markets

{{ currentBoardShortName }}
  • Markets
  • Indices
  • Currencies
  • Energy
  • Metals
{{data.symbol | reutersRICLabelFormat:group.RICS}}
 
{{data.netChng | number: 4 }}
{{data.netChng | number: 2 }}
{{data | displayCurrencySymbol}} {{data.price | number: 4 }}
{{data.price | number: 2 }}
{{data.symbol | reutersRICLabelFormat:group.RICS}}
 
{{data.netChng | number: 4 }}
{{data.netChng | number: 2 }}
{{data | displayCurrencySymbol}} {{data.price | number: 4 }}
{{data.price | number: 2 }}

Commodities Videos

VIDEO SIGN OUT

{{ currentStream.Name }}

{{ currentStream.Desc }}

Related Video

Continuous Play:
ON OFF

The information you requested is not available at this time, please check back again soon.

May 11, 2017

MEG Energy losses below expectations on higher prices, lower costs

Energy

Security Not Found

The stock symbol {{StockChart.Ric}} does not exist

See Full Stock Page »

MEG Energy Corp (MEG.TO) reported a smaller-than-expected quarterly loss, helped by higher bitumen prices and lower production costs.

MEG, whose key operations are in the Athabasca oil sands region in Alberta, said average realized price for bitumen rose to $37.93 in the first quarter, from $11.43, a year earlier.

The company's net operating costs fell 1.2 per cent to $8.43 per barrel in the three months ended March 31.

Non-energy operating costs also fell 19.4 per cent to $5.20 per barrel in the latest quarter.

Bitumen production rose marginally to 77,245 barrels per day (bpd) from 76,640 bpd.

However, MEG's net profit shrank to $1.59 million or 1 cent per share, from $130.8 million, or 58 cents per share, a year earlier.

The latest quarter included more than $98 million in gains, while the year-ago quarter had gains of more than $335 million, primarily related to foreign exchange and commodity risk management.

Excluding items, the Calgary-based company lost 29 cents per share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. Analysts on average had expected a loss of 33 cents.

Revenue nearly doubled to $560 million, beating analysts' estimate of $517.1 million.